and Past Research
B2BB Kids is the next stage of the Back to Baby Basics longitudinal study. We look forward to seeing how the B2BB kids have grown! We will gather additional information from all of our B2BB families when your child is 4 years of age to 6 years of age, including lab visits at 4 years and 5 years. We will be in touch soon with all of our B2BB families to schedule the first set of lab visits.
If you are a participating B2BB family and your contact information has changed,
please let us know through phone (814-863-3878) or B2BBkids@psu.edu.
We appreciate you helping us keep in touch!
to Baby Basics Project
longitudinal study followed babies over their first 18 months of life. The study
examined how babies express their needs and whether this influences their behavior
over time. We are interested in the physical growth and emotional development
of infants during this particular period of their lives, such as their crying, eating, and sleeping patterns, as well as their ability to soothe.
We have observed a variety of self-soothing and emotional regulation techniques
among the children as well as parental involvement in assisting the soothing
Collecting the needed information for this study has included following participating
families over a series of home and lab visits as well as questionnaires completed
by parents. We met with families for the first time when the each child was
4 months old at the family home. We then conducted lab visits when each child
was 6, 12, and 18 months old. We also brought a new group of families into the study, and conducted lab visits with these families at 6, 12, and 18 months.
We are currently coding data from the Back to Baby Basics Project,
and look forward to sharing our results soon!
As children develop they are increasingly asked to control their
behavior. Waiting for food, walking but not running, and refraining from touching
interesting objects are just a few of the prohibitions that children face. An
example of this kind of developmental task is the tolerance of frustration.
Being asked to stop playing and come inside to do a chore requires the child
to inhibit feelings of anger about having to stop an enjoyable activity. This
ability to control one's emotions is often referred to as emotion regulation.
The development of the ability to regulate one's emotion is believed to be a
product of the child's temperament and environmental influences, specifically
parental socialization. One of the primary purposes of the Emotional Beginnings
Project of the Infant and Child Temperament Laboratory was to investigate how
infants and toddlers come to regulate their emotions.
The regulation of emotion may also be influenced by the child’s
physiology. In this project we examined heart rate activity, specifically vagal
tone, and related it to the child’s behavior during several tasks. Differences
in resting vagal tone and changes in vagal tone to emotional and cognitive challenge
may be a marker of one’s ability to control emotions and behavior. Thus,
we may be able to better predict how well an infant can regulate their emotions
and those infants who may need more external intervention.
The ability to regulate emotions also has implications for social
development. For example, children who do not tolerate frustration and act out
their anger have difficulties in school and with their peers. Thus, emotional
dysregulation may be related to later behavior problems. Another goal of our
project was to examine the relationship between early emotion regulation ability
and later behavior problems.
To accomplish our goals we conducted a longitudinal study that
was funded by the National Institutes for Mental Health. In this study children
and their parents were seen several times from when the child was 2 weeks of
age to 2 years of age. We used home visits, inoculation visits, and laboratory
visits to gather our data. In addition, questionnaires and infant cry diaries
were completed by parents. At the inception, 150 families had joined the project
and we eagerly followed them through the infancy period.
Because behavior problems do not emerge until the preschool
years, The National Institutes of Mental Health was very interested in having
us follow up on our sample so funded us for another 5 years. In addition to
investigating how early emotion regulation ability relates to behavior problems
in preschool, we also expanded our investigation to include another measure
of the child’s physiology - sympathetic activation (pre-ejection period),
observations of behavioral control and executive function, and assessment of
parenting behaviors. Toward that end we had children and their parents return
to the laboratory when the children were 4 ½ , and 5 ½ for two
visits, one with their mothers and one with their fathers. During the summer
prior to entering first grade our participants returned in groups of 3 or 4
where they interacted with each other and completed a variety of tasks. The
final data point was during the first year of elementary school when we had
parents and teachers complete a number of questionnaires.
We are continuing to analyze the data from both phases of the
Emotional Beginnings Project. Please check the publications page periodically
to see what we have discovered.
Stifter has collaborated with Drs. Clancy Blair, Douglas Granger and Mark Greenberg
on a study within a larger project called The Family Life Project. Below is
a general description of this project. Our study, Project 1, is concerned with
the characteristics of infants and children growing up in rural poverty. We
are focusing on the child’s temperament and physiology including heart
rate and cortisol reactivity.
The Family Life Project
The University of North Carolina
and Penn State University are collaborating on a large and exciting five-year
study of children’s lives in rural counties. The Family Life Project team
brings together 23 researchers with expertise in education, medicine, psychology,
sociology, anthropology, geography and human development.
Existing research provides important
information about families and children living in large, urban environments,
but relatively little knowledge about how families and children are influenced
by living in smaller cities, towns, and rural areas.
The Family Life Project’s primary
goal is to develop a better understanding of how growing up in such areas might
influence the development of young children in the birth to three year age range.
In particular, we are interested in learning about how differences in children’s
development are linked to variations in temperament, family experience, community
structure, economic circumstances, and ethnicity.
The Family Life Project is organized
into two parts. The first part involves an in-depth appraisal of community characteristics
that affect families and children’s lives. We also conduct intensive interviews
and observations with 72 families distributed equally across Wayne, Wilson,
and Sampson counties in North Carolina, as well as Blair, Huntington and Cambria
Pennsylvania counties. These particular counties were chosen because their residents
live in regions ranging from small cities to remote rural areas. This project
began in November 2002.
In the second part of the project,
700 families with newborns living in the three NC counties and 500 families
living in the three PA counties participate in a series of home visits, childcare
visits, and phone calls throughout the first three years of their babies’
lives. During these home visits, the families will be interviewed, observed
in their homes, and asked to engage in activities such as playing and reading
with their children at five different time points: when children are 2, 6, 15,
24, and 36 months of age. Childcare visits include observing the child in his
or her caregiving setting. Regular contact will also be made by phone to document
important changes in family life.
Infant colic has been an
enigma for parents, pediatricians and psychologists. Popularly defined as paroxysmal
crying that lasts for a total of 3 or more hours per day/3 or more days per
week colic has been poorly studied. Recently, however, researchers from the
medical, psychological and nutrition fields have turned their attention to this
intense but temporary condition and we were pleased to be a part of this effort.
Because anecdotal accounts of colic have suggested some gastrointestinal involvement
we proposed to examine its possible biological origins by using a noninvasive
measure of gastric motility. The electrogastrogram (EGG) has been used with
adults and studies have found that adults who suffer from motion sickness or
experience nausea and vomiting exhibit patterns of gastric dysrhythmia. Thus,
we hypothesized that infants with colic may be experiencing gastric discomfort
which might be measured using the EGG.
Early studies of colic have
also suggested that parents may contribute to their infants excessive crying.
However, colic is not restricted to firstborn infants whose parents would have
little experience. In addition, colic usually remits quite suddenly by 3 months
of age which implies that parents became more sensitive overnight. In this study
we examined parents’ personality, interactive style, and perceptions in
an effort to clarify their role in their child's crying.
Finally, one of the criticisms
lodged against colic research is that many studies are retrospective or rely
on parents to refer their infant for problematic crying. Both methods introduce
bias into the sample as a certain type of parent may complain of colic or remember
their infants crying as intense. In our study we drew our colic sample from
a normative community sample and determined through special interview techniques
whether an infant was colicky or not. Infants and families were recruited and
tested at 2 weeks of age before the onset of colic. Parents were called at 3,
4 and 5 weeks and asked open ended questions about their infants cry behavior.
Based on these reports colic was identified. All parents were then asked to
keep a 4 day, 24 hour diary that recorded the infants crying (and other states).
This data then verified our determination of colic. While not completely without
parental bias, this method reduces it significantly. In addition, by recruiting
and testing infants before colic begins we are able to collect antecedent variables
and test their predictions to colic.
The consequences of having
colic were examined in this study. Infants and their mothers returned to our
lab at 5, 10 and 18 months when we put them through a series of tasks designed
to elicit different types of reactivity. We also assessed their interactive
behavior with their mothers. Finally, at 18 months the infants' social competence
was assessed in the form of compliance and empathic responding. Visit our [publications
page, LINK] for recent articles on infant colic taken from the study.